Cultural Diversity

          After the presentation presented by Denise, I learned a lot of new things over the topic of Cultural Diversity. His presentation really made me think about how different things are in places  other than Carroll or Ames, IA. You can't just think everybody and everything needs to be just like you. You have to have an idea of what life is life in other people's shoes.
         By living life in someone else's shoes, I mean there is more to life that your beliefs. Other people have different beliefs and different morals, such as religion. Religion can vary in different regions of the United States. It's dramatically different even going from town to town in Iowa.
            He also stated how different things go California compared to Iowa. Oakland is a very hard, rough placed to live and be apart of. Violence is a huge problem in places like this, but people learn how to live with it and react and live their lives as normal as possible.
          All in all, everybody is different. Just because somebody does look, act, dress, or think the same way you do, doesn't mean you cant talk to them and communicate together. The nice thing about the United States is that we are a very diverse country, and we get to experience other ways of living. In the end, we all need to treat each other with respect and keep in mind, everybody is their own person.

Social Media Post

          For Social Media Week, I chose to do the "create your own resume portfolio in a website". What I did was created a specific resume for the job field I plan to partake in after college. After this I created a website that explains what I want to do and how I plan on doing. This website goes through my steps towards reaching my goals, and what I need to do to succeed along with the resume I can use for this. Its out their now and can be updating or changed as things change during my college years.
          I noticed that these articles did a great job of showing how easy it is to get your name out there and find a career in the field you wish to go into. Twitter especially plays a large role in this. It is soooo incredibly easy to go to any search engine and type in any name and come up with so much different information, some good some bad. So yeah, its a good thing but can also play a negative role on "you" getting out there to the world. Another one of the articles went over how easy it can be to spread news nowadays through social media such as twitter and facebook. You can add a photo or tweet about your plans for the afternoon and the next thing you know, 230 people know exactly whats happening at 3:00! Even if you are located in Mexico or France, if you have a "follower" or "friend" from the United States, they will know whats going on and your news is spread to a completely different country, kind of how Mexico did with their important information in the article. All of the articles went over how GREAT of a thing social media can be, but also how it can be a bad deal. If a future employee wants to see your background, they will go to facebook and see a picture that you may have not wanted others to see. This is a prime example of how social media is bad.
          What I came out of with this was that social media can make or break you. It's shaped how you shape it. If you want to be prim and proper, it can be great for your future and potential places of employment. However, if you go out every weekend and add those pictures of you holding a bud light and you are only 19 years of age, thats where it can all go south. Social media is most definitely a good thing, but you just need to think about what you do on it.

#4

          On Wednesday, October 3rd, I went to a lecture over Environmentalism in the Sun Room located in the MU. This lecture was called "Environmentalism without nature", and it was put on by Paul Wapner. Paul started off by talking about his book, "Living through the end of nature; The future of American Environmentalism". The main point I picked up from this book was that humans have changed the world in so many different ways, it's hard for us to pick out specific things that we can actually call "nature". He really talked about how he believed that climate change would and will ruin a lot of things, including nature as a whole. Paul brought up a specific part of this book where he talked about how people were changing everything around him. He brought up a part where he lived next to a lake, a very quiet lake. Suddenly motorboats and people started appearing and using this "quiet" lake as a source of recreation and he felt that this was damaging the area. It wasn't just nature anymore, it was a loud, crowded area for people to be hanging around all of the time.
          Environmentalism is summed up to be a way to protect nature and the environment that used to be. It is a mix between science over the environment and nature, and governmental policies used to somewhat protect the environment in some way. It is not necessarily scientific and retains more to philosophical thoughts over conserving nature, such as trees, water, and land. Pollution plays a very large role in negative things happening to our environment. Air pollution is damaging our ozone, water pollution is damaging lakes, streams, and oceans in the United States, and even a type of noise pollution can play a role in this. Nature is not nature if people are driving away on a quiet lake in a loud motorboat poling a group of skiers. Anything that disrupts the natural ways of life plays a negative role in this. Paul believes that serious change needs to occur in order to retain our environment. New energy sources need to be invented that eliminate extra negative side effects, cities need to be started that dont produce air pollution and as much toxins to the environment through air pollution, and people need to start thinking abou their actions. I can not say I necessarily agree a hundred percent with what Paul is trying to say, but I definitely do agree with some of it. It would take a lot of work to get rid of all the negative things effecting nature, and unfortuntly I don't think its possible. However, some of these things can be prevented and we can get rid of some of these things. Paul did a good job of opening my eyes to some of these problems, and I will think twice before doing things that could put our environment in jeopardy.

Lecture #3

          Last Thursday, September 27th, I attended the lecture seminar over forest management. It was called "Beyond Spotted Owls and Logging: Forest and Ecosystem Management. It was put on in the Great Hall of the MU by Jerry Franklin. Franklin was a leader of Forest Management in the U.S. He put on the FEMAT which is the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Test.
          His main talk was over the Spotted Owls Controversy. Spotted Owls are native to North American but we can't garentee that for long said Jerry. They are near threatened and their population is dramatically decreasing. They are trying to create somewhat of a comeback for this population under the ESA which is the Endangered Species Act. What they are doing in the long run is trying to create logging for this specific species. So far they are up to 1700 acres of strickly forest logging. This is a serious problem because they are dramatically dropping in population. Statistically they are dropping by nearly 50 percent annually.
          Jerry has done a lot of work dealing with the ecosystem management and loggin in America. He did 14 years of Forest Service Research in the Pacific North West Ecosystem, two years as director of the National Science Foundation, and 14 years as Chief Plant Ecologist in Pacific West studies programs. He stated "Ecosystem Management is the main service to conserve the ecosystem and to restore Natural Resources back to their original state".  The main objective of the ESA ( Endangered Species Act ) is to effectively maintain the ethical use of natural resources such as coal, oil (petroleum), and wood. The wood is a main thing that brought on the topic of forest and ecosystem management. Not only is the spotted owls controversy such a big deal, but more and more forest animals are losing their honest to deforestation and if this isn't solved soon, many of these species will be going extinct.